Friday, March 09, 2012

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ ေနာက္ေၾကာင္းျပန္ႏုိင္ေသး ကင္တားနား အစီရင္ခံ.. 9 March 2012 ... RFA

ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံ ေနာက္ေၾကာင္းျပန္ႏုိင္ေသး ကင္တားနား အစီရင္ခံ

2012-03-09
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံရဲ႕ လက္ရွိျပဳျပင္ ေျပာင္းလဲေရးေတြဟာ လူ႔အခြင့္ေရး အေျခအေနအေပၚ အျပဳသေဘာေဆာင္တဲ့ သက္ေရာက္မႈေတြရွိေပမယ့္ အခ်ိန္မေရြး ေနာက္ေၾကာင္း ျပန္လွည့္သြားႏုိင္တဲ့ အႏၲရာယ္္ရွိေနေၾကာင္း ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံဆုိင္ရာ လူ႔အခြင့္ေရး အထူးကုိယ္စားလွယ္ မစၥတာ ေသာမတ္ ကင္တားနားရဲ႕ ေနာက္ဆံုးထုတ္ အစီရင္ခံစာမွာ ေရးသားေဖာ္ျပလုိက္ပါတယ္။
AFP PHOTO / Soe Than WIN
၂၀၁၁ ခုႏွစ္ ၾသဂုတ္လ ၂၃ ရက္ ေန႔က ေနျပည္ေတာ္တြင္ ျပည္သူ႔လႊတ္ေတာ္ ဥကၠဌ သူရဦးေရႊမန္းႏွင့္ ကုလသမဂၢ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရး အထူးကုိယ္စားလွယ္ မစၥတာ ကင္တားနားတုိ႔ ေတြ႔ဆုံခဲ့ပါသည္။
ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံကုိ ဇႏၷ၀ါရီ ၃၁ ရက္ကေန ေဖေဖာ္၀ါရီ ၅ ရက္အထိ သြားေရာက္ခဲ့တဲ့ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရး အထူးကုိယ္စားလွယ္ဟာ မတ္လ ၇ ရက္က အစီရင္ခံစာ ထုတ္ျပန္ခဲ့ပါတယ္။ ျမန္မာႏုိင္ငံက အေျခအေနေတြကုိ လာမယ့္ မတ္လ ၁၂ ရက္မွာ ကုလသမဂၢ လူ႔အခြင့္ေရး ေကာ္မရွင္ကုိ တင္သြင္း အစီရင္ခံမွာ ျဖစ္ပါတယ္။
လာမယ့္ ဧၿပီ ၁ ရက္မွာ က်င္းပမယ့္ ၾကားျဖတ္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲဟာ လက္ရွိအစုိးရရဲ႕ ျပဳျပင္ေျပာင္းလဲေရး ဘယ္ေလာက္အထိ ခရီးေရာက္ ေအာင္ျမင္မႈရွိတယ္ဆုိတာကုိ ေဖာ္ျပမယ့္ စမ္းသပ္ခ်က္တစ္ခု ျဖစ္တယ္လုိ႔လည္း အစီရင္ခံစာမွာ ေရးသားထားပါတယ္။
က်န္ရွိေနေသးတဲ့ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးဆုိင္ရာ စုိးရိမ္ပူပန္စရာ အေျခအေနေတြ၊ စိန္ေခၚမႈေတြကုိ ဆက္လက္ ေျဖရွင္းေဆာင္ရြက္ဖုိ႔လုိေၾကာင္း၊ တရားမွ်တေရးနဲ႔ တာ၀န္ရွိမႈအျပင္ အမွန္တရား ေဖာ္ထုတ္ႏုိင္ေရးစတဲ့ အခ်က္ေတြ လုပ္ေဆာင္ဖုိ႔ လုိေနေသးေၾကာင္း မစၥတာ ကင္တားနားရဲ႕အစီရင္ခံစာမွာ ေဖာ္ျပထားပါတယ္။
မစၥတာကင္တားနားရဲ႕ စာမ်က္ႏွာ ၂၁ မ်က္ႏွာ ပါ၀င္တဲ့ အစီရင္ခံစာထဲမွာ အက်ဥ္းေထာင္ေတြအတြင္း က်န္ေနေသးတဲ့ ႏုိင္ငံေရးက်ဥ္းသားေတြ အေျခအေန၊ လက္ရွိျဖစ္ပြားေနတဲ့ တုိင္းရင္းသား လူမ်ိဳးစုနယ္ေျမေတြက အေျခအေနေတြအျပင္ လက္ရွိ ျပဳျပင္ျပ႒ာန္းေနတဲ့ ဥပေဒေတြနဲ႔ ပတ္သက္လုိ႔ က႑အလုိက္ ေခါင္းစဥ္အသီးသီး ခြဲျခား ေဖာ္ျပထားပါတယ္။
, ,

2012 Ethics in Action → Vol. 6 No. 1 - February 2012 ..Ethnic wars must end for Burma to be 'on the right track' to democracy and development ..Article .. 8 March 2012

Ethnic wars must end for Burma to be 'on the right track' to democracy and development

v6n1EthnicElimination3.jpgHelen Joe

(photo on right: A child suffering from diarrhea in Laiza, camp no. 8 with a population of 8000 people in August 2011. Photo: Banyar Kong Janoi, freelance journalist.)
Beneath a makeshift roof in the misty morning, a funeral took place on Friday, 2 December 2011 for an eight-year-old Kachin boy who died from diarrhea the night before in a refugee camp in Laiza, Kachin. The boy’s mother was suffering from cholera and malaria too. She did not know when would be the last day in her life, or if she could even survive another day. She had no money for the medicine and food she needed, nor did she know how to obtain any money. Sometimes she would just kneel on the concrete floor where she slept at night and pray that the civil war would end soon. She also prayed for the consolation of the sick and hungry children whose cries could be heard everywhere around the camps.

Finally, she would pray that God would give her strength to fight the illness that haunted her. Even though there were doctors and nurses in the camp, they could not give her much attention because they had to take care of other patients who might have been queuing for three days or so.

Kachin state, where the camps are located, is situated in the northern part of Burma, which has been home to the longest running civil wars with the military for more than five decades. Thousands of people have since fled their homes to escape the fighting and associated human rights abuses, with an estimated 50,000 internally displaced persons scattered around the state. Forty of these are in and around Laiza, the headquarters of the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), where there has been a recent outbreak of cholera due to lack of sanitation and clean water. 1

In Burma, ethnic wars are happening not only in Kachin State, but also in many other areas across the country populated by ethnic groups. While some areas may look peaceful, the military dictatorship has been exploiting the local ethnic minorities for over 60 years.

Ethnicity is a longstanding unsolved issue in Burma that has become a major bone of contention. Burma has officially 135 ethnic groups making up 40 percent of Burma’s population, and more than 20 armed ethnic groups have fought against the government. For a long period of time, considering these ethnic groups as second class has been common in Burma. The principle of marginalizing them has resulted in their isolation from military rule. These are the reasons for the emergence of armed ethnic groups who have been fighting for greater autonomy from the majority Burma-led central government since independence from the British in 1948.

In the landmark year 2011, when Burma was seen as dramatically transforming towards democracy, the military conflict with these armed groups continued. In remote, indigenous populated areas, the military government is systematically committing crimes and human right violations against the people, including forced labor, religious persecution, human minesweepers, disappearances, torture, rape and widespread pillaging, looting, extrajudicial killings, as well as occasionally burning villages.2 Both insurgents and local residents are targeted. These acts are not easily forgotten, making the ethnic population more distrustful of the army and government.

The new government has not raised the urgent issue of military reform, and these military abuses persist. The government continues to suppress dissent through a raft of repressive laws and the lack of an independent judiciary.

A 58-year-old Kachin farmer, who said all his possessions had been taken by the Burmese army, told Human Rights Watch, "We lost our homes and properties to the Burmese soldiers several times. That is why I don’t have hope in this situation." 3

In an interview with Asian Calling, Khun Oo reh, the general secretary of the Karenni Progressive Party, stated,
We have been discriminated against and we have been ignored. The majority Burman ethnic group always wants to control the country. We are not treated fairly. Also, we are fighting to protect our ethnic identity. We want self-determination. We want a federal democratic system in Burma. When Burma gained independence from Britain it was not so that the Burmese people could rule but so all ethnic groups could have self-determination. We all have to live and rule together. 4
Ethnic minorities want to be assimilated into mainstream Burmese society while maintaining and promoting their culture and dialect free from discrimination. They also want equality before the law. Even the armed ethnic groups believe that trustworthy negotiation is crucial for any peace agreement, together with federal political arrangements.

The government however, demands a ceasefire first, not due to any sympathy with the ethnic cause, but due to its interest in economic development and wanting to transform the entire ethnic minority to one nationality (Burman). Without a guarantee for ethnic rights, the various ceasefire agreements cannot bring peace and can be broken at any time. For genuine peace and development, human rights must be made a priority rather than any other political agenda. Human rights must be developed on the ground, not just passed as laws in parliament. Only then can other sectors develop.

Despite the ongoing conflict with armed ethnic groups, President Thein Sein has tried to quell some ethnic conflicts (for instance in the states of Kachin, Kayin and Shan) and push through reforms, such as four prisoner amnesties during his 11 months of rule.

Another significant change in the country, indicating a loosening of dictatorial rule, is that pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, whose party was the long repressed opposition party the National League for Democracy, is allowed to compete in the by-elections. International observers have been particularly pleased with these two steps towards greater democracy.

While laws are continuously being reformed or enacted in parliament at present, it remains to be seen how they will be implemented and the level of social participation involved. Generally however, the government is focusing on rushing through economic development, rather than institutional reforms. For this reason, the government has not yet implemented basic rights for citizens, and nor has it scrapped politically repressive laws like the electronic transaction law, penal code section 505, Immigration (Emergency Provisions) Act, 1947 and so forth5.

Likewise, in this transition period, it is only the parliamentarians who are profiting from government property as a result of opening up the economy.  This is another way to monopolize the country, as the old brutal government used to do. As can be seen from the 2008 constitution drafted by the junta, the military generals can obtain up to 25 percent of seats in parliament. Meanwhile, more land confiscation will occur, affecting ordinary citizens.

While international scholars are debating that social and political development should occur before economic development, the Burmese government is talking about trade delegations; this is like putting the cart before the horse. If economic development is pushed through in Burma before basic freedoms like freedom of expression, freedom of political belief and guarantee for minority rights, there will be massive bribery of government officials as well as ethnic minority leaders. Proper economic development needs the concrete foundation of rule of law, which does not exist in Burma yet.

There can be no development without peace and no peace without properly addressing the human rights and minority issues. In other words, no democratic state will come into being in Burma without first taking into account the specific demands of the ethnic groups.

According to Dr. Kyaw Yin Hlaing, a professor at the City University of Hong Kong,  merely pointing out those problems will not allow us to move on to the next stage, and Burma will remain in a poor environment.6 Does this mean that we should rush towards building concrete economic zones and genuine democracy while ignoring gross human rights violations and wars in ethnic zones? Meanwhile, the chief advisor of the president, Ko Ko Hlain confidently and repeatedly notes that "We are on the right track".7 Burmese government representative, U Myint Soe, boldly states there is no human rights abuse in Burma, while blaming the ethnic insurgents for disrupting economic growth.8 The question that comes to mind now, is how can the government promote the basic rights of ordinary people in Burma, while the wars in conflict zones do not seem to stop?

Additionally, a senior government official bluntly disclosed that
If the people of Myanmar want democracy, the commander in chief will use the constitution and take over the government. The coup is more real than what many people might think. If there is another coup, the situation will be back to square one and this will be very bad for the country. The coup could also bring many more hard-liners back to the government. 9
What this means, is that those who wish to see political reforms in Burma should not do anything that would cause the return of the senior General to power. To counter this, it is essential to reform the country’s laws, including the 2008 Constitution, under which the President has no authority over the military. It is a grave matter to consider that the military can take over power and rule the country at any time.

All of this shows the country is far from stable, and that genuine democracy and freedom is going to require more change than the moving of parliament and certain cities. Without engaging in a genuine national reconciliation process, it will be difficult to develop democracy, and without practicing federalism, Burma will definitely go back to the old days.

Hkun Okker, regarded by non-Burman ethnic peoples as one of their leading legal experts, strongly criticized the ongoing peace talks and agreements as a “quick fix” to solve what is primarily a political issue between the Burman government and the non-Burman ethnic peoples. “They are generously offering business opportunities under the name of Development or Special Economic Zones and using them as delaying tactics against meaningful political dialogue,” he charged. 10

While the recent rapid changes in Burma are encouraging, particularly compared to the recent past, it is difficult to predict whether the current progress will bring real change to the country in the future or not. Ethnic groups in Burma have been struggling under the harsh military rule for more than 50 years; now is surely the time to realize their rights and freedom to live with dignity.

---------------------------
Notes:
1  http://www.mizzima.com/special/kachin-battle-report/6525-cholera-outbreak-in-kachin-refugee-camps.html
2  https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/Burma-KachinRpt-ExecSum11.30.2011.pdf
3  http://www.hrw.org/news/2011/10/18/burma-army-committing-abuses-kachin-state
4  http://www.asiacalling.org/en/news/burma/2463-ceasefires-will-not-bring-about-lasting-peace-burmese-ethnic-leaders
5  For more information, please see ‘Diagnosing the un-rule of law in Burma’, http://www.article2.org/mainfile.php/0902/379/
6  http://kongjanoi.blogspot.com/2012/01/is-government-really-honest-to-ethnics.html
7  http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/612/news61218.html
8  Quoted from 26-27 January conference on “Myanmar after the 2010 Elections”, City University of Hong Kong.
9  http://www6.cityu.edu.hk/searc/Data/FileUpload/306/WP111_11_Kyaw.pdf
10  http://www.shanland.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4383%3Aethnic-leader-unless-charter-is-amended-ethnic-identity-will-be-in-peril&catid=85%3Apolitics&Itemid=266
---------------------------
Other references:
http://daniellesabai1.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/what-new-wind-is-blowing-in-burma/
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/world/asia/ethnic-war-with-kachin-intensifies-in-myanmar-jeopardizing-united-states-ties.html?_r=1
http://jinghpawkasa.blogspot.com/2012/01/miwa-mungdan-masha-hpe-myen-hpyen-la-ni.html
http://irrawaddy.org/article.php?art_id=22862
http://www.freeburmarangers.org/Reports/2012/20120127.html
http://bnionline.net/index.php/news/kng/12546-burma-army-redeploys-troops-to-kachin-frontline
, ,

ASIA: WOMEN'S DAY-- Discrimination and violence hamper gender equity ..AHRC Statement .. 8 March 2012

A Statement by the Asian Human Rights Commission on the occasion of the International Women's Day

Today marks the International Women's Day, a day to reflect on the gains achieved by women in the respect and protection of their rights and to denounce the places in which those rights are too frequently trampled on. In its 1977 resolution 32/142, the United Nations General Assembly called for the proclaiming of a UN Day for Women's Rights and International Peace to "create favourable conditions for the elimination of discrimination against women and for their full and equal participation in the social development process". It is unfortunate that discrimination and violence against women in Asia continue to be the norm today, and that their participation in society is both minimal and unappreciated. Discrimination is in fact increasingly taking on a violent face, and the Asian Human Rights Commission denounces the high rates of rape and sexual violence prevalent in Asia. The utter neglect with which state institutions as well as society address such issues and deal with the victims is symptomatic of the continuous challenges Asian women face in claiming their rights and contributing to social development.
Rape and sexual violence are widespread in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nepal and Burma, while a recent increase in such cases has been seen in Sri Lanka and Indonesia.
While all human rights abuse victims in Asia struggle to obtain legal redress amidst weak rule of law frameworks and corrupt justice officials, victims of gender-based violence face the added difficulties of discrimination and sexual stereotypes, including from the police and the judiciary. It has been observed all over Asia that rape victims routinely face hostility from law enforcement personnel and the courts.  In many cases the police collude with the perpetrators to pressurize the victim to drop the case or to enter a negotiated settlement. All of this was seen in the abduction and rape of Pakistani teenager Uzma Ayub, who was gang-raped in captivity for one year, before escaping in September 2011. Since then she has been struggling to obtain justice through the courts, to little avail. Uzma and her family faced numerous threats and settlement offers, and finally her elder brother was murdered in December 2011. The police and army officers involved in her abduction and rape are known, and yet they are not being promptly held accountable.
The investigation of cases of violence against women lack professionalism and often the police may not even inform the victim of the need for a medical exam. When the victim does go for a medical exam, she is likely to face a dismissive attitude from the doctors and hospital staff, influenced by the dominant social attitude stigmatizing rape victims. A Nepali nun who was raped in July 2011 was initially turned away from a hospital for treatment, while her nunnery debated whether or not she would be allowed to return.
State institutions and officials are just as guilty of harbouring patriarchal and repressive attitudes against women as the rest of society. These attitudes tend to place the blame for rape on the victim herself, rather than the perpetrator. This not only allows the perpetrators to go free, encouraging further violence, but also contributes to a second victimization of the survivor of rape, who too often has to face a hostile attitude from her community. Judges, particularly of the lower judiciary, have largely not been trained or sensitized to gender issues and their way of dealing with such cases often causes further humiliation for victims. Reports from various Asian countries detail rape victims having been publicly cross-examined in court and forced to describe the rape in details, with male judges using insensitive and humiliating words in the process. In other words, rather than protecting women's fundamental rights, the police and judiciary are turning themselves into instruments to perpetuate traditional discriminatory and repressive views against women.
As a result, conviction rates for reported rapes remain alarmingly low, and seeking legal redress becomes synonymous to facing further harassment and stigma for the victims. An overhaul of the justice and policing systems to strengthen their capacity to work professionally in an accountable manner is thus required. Nevertheless, it is only by changing the perception of rape victims in the society, by addressing dominant discriminatory views against women, that women's access to justice can genuinely be increased. This includes gender-sensitive training for all public officials, as well as education and awareness within the larger society regarding education for girls and equal opportunities for both genders.
Despite the high rates of violence against women, this issue is largely not understood as a priority, often subsumed in discussions of national security, economic development or other issues. Until discrimination and violence against women is conceived as an integral part of the human rights movement, there will be little change in the ground reality facing women in Asia and many other parts of the world.
Sexual violence prevents women from realizing many other rights, slows their journey to emancipation and makes gender equity a distant dream. Fears of facing violence in public areas, followed by societal attitudes blaming victims of rape for their abuse, work to confine women to their homes. How can women participate in the economy and politics, a springboard to ensure their capacity to protect their rights, if they are at risk and then blamed for doing so? It is crucial for such blame and condemnation to be shifted to the perpetrator, while the survivors are ensured support and justice.
The Asian Human Rights Commission recalls that the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women mandates state parties to "modify the social and cultural patterns of conduct of men and women, with a view to achieving the elimination of prejudices and customary and all other practices which are based on the idea of the inferiority or the superiority of either of the sexes or on stereotyped roles for men and women". To eradicate rape, violence and discrimination against women from Asian societies, a comprehensive strategy of modification of societal patterns and structures fuelling prejudice and stereotypes are necessary and the incapacity of law enforcement institutions to protect the women from sexual violence must be addressed in priority. Only then can women truly realize their potential and participate in society's development. With the poor state of many of Asia's societies, surely the participation of women will be akin to tapping much needed resources.
Document Type :
Statement
Document ID :
AHRC-STM-047-2012
, ,

BURMA: WOMEN'S DAY -- No protection for women .. 8 March 2012 AHRC

 BURMA: WOMEN'S DAY -- No protection for women .. Statement for International Day of Women

In October 2011 a 28-year-old woman Sumlut Roi Ja, who is the mother of 14-month-old girl, was abducted and allegedly gang-raped by the military. She was residing in Hkai Bang village, Momouk District, Kachin State, near to the border of China where a militaristic ethnic conflict is taking place. Soon after she was kidnapped her family made a serious complaint to the military post in Loije town and this complaint was quickly spread around the country and abroad. Yet, more than two months later no progress has been made and the military post continues to deny any involvement. The family's desperate situation became even worse when they were assaulted for making the complaint (AHRC-240-2011).

On the 9th of February 2012 the case was brought before the high court of Pyithu Hluttaw Judicial and legislative Committee Naypyitaw in accordance with Chapter 8 of the citizen's fundamental rights, article 378. The family received help from local lawyers and human rights groups that supported the family in their search for justice. Till this day, the accused Captains and Generals from LIB (321) of the military have denied that they have detained female or male villagers during the conflict.

The case of Roi Ja highlights the fact that women in Burma are not able to find legal redress, file complaints against the judiciary or receive compensation. This is especially damning for the women who live in conflict zones. The civil war in Myanmar has placed women in a position where they are extremely vulnerable. Frequently, women are forced to work as porters and unpaid labourers for military troops and they are often raped by military personnel.

Ethnic women in areas where the junta is engaged in armed conflict face constant threats of attack, forced marriage, rape, torture, slavery and murder by the military. Male members of the community are often taken away to work as porters, serve as soldiers or to be killed. Women are left on their own to fend for themselves and raise the children as single parents.

The Burmese people have crossed the border to neighboring countries as refugees in the last 50 years. Tens of thousands of people belonging to the ethnic minorities of Shan, Karenni, Karen and Mon live in squalid relocation centers set up by the military. Life is not easy for the women in these camps. Even after fleeing to a neighbouring country for protection their trouble is not over. Female refugees and children are the groups that are the most at risk.

Increasingly, the military employs repressive strategies in order to ensure that any soldier or officer guilty of war crimes such as rape and sexual violence against civilian women and girls is able to evade punishment. The military makes use of a broad range of repressive tactics. It attempts to create a climate of fear that prevents civilians from speaking out.  Death threats are issued if any complaints are voiced. False imprisonment, torture and disappearances are common occurrences. Often the family members of rape victims that complain to the military are arrested and accused of being supporters of the resistance.

According to the documentation of Kachin Women's Association Thailand (KWAT), women and children have suffered some of the worst crimes committed such as rape and sexual violence. Women and girls are mostly targeted by the military personnel during the conflict. On September 24th 2011, three separate rapes of two girls aged 14 and 17 and an older woman aged 40 were committed by Burmese Army troops in Muse and Kutkai townships in the Shan State of Burma.

Some of the worst human rights abuse against women takes place in the border regions populated by ethnic minorities. According to human rights groups the military kills, beats, rapes and arbitrarily detains civilians at will in these areas. Impunity for crimes and human rights violations committed by the state's security forces is deeply entrenched. The Women's League of Burma has accused the military of systematically using rape and forced marriage as a weapon against ethnic minorities.

"It is a failure of the Judicial body and the legal protection for women in that the perpetrators of murder, arbitrary arrests and torture in the conflict have not been brought to justice," Min Lwin Oo , lawyer ,the spokesperson for Burma from AHRC states. He adds "the chief justice from supreme court comes from the military department, so how he can bring justice to victims of crimes committed by the military."

In Burma the judiciary is not independent. In a system that lacks transparency and accountability, corruption and economic mismanagement are rampant at both the national and the local levels. Judges are appointed or approved by the junta and adjudicate cases according to its decrees. Administrative detention laws allow people to be held without charge, trial, or access to legal counsel for up to five years if the SPDC concludes that they have threatened the state's security or sovereignty.

International Convention for empowerment for women

Myanmar has ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) on the 22nd of July 1997 with a reservation regarding Article 29. In order to promote and protect the rights of women and girls, the Government has established the Myanmar National Committee for Women's Affairs in 1996, as a national machinery to carry out the Beijing Declaration and Platform of Action. In Addition, the Myanmar's Women's Affairs Federation had been established in 2003 to take effective measures in women's affairs and implement the principles and guidelines laid down by the Myanmar National Committee for Women's Affairs. According to the announcement of the committee, free legal assistance and advice to complainants have also been given as well as letters for taking legal action that have been forwarded to the relevant departments.

Yet, the committee is comprised of members of the military and its followers. It is founded by the junta and therefore the committee has no power. It does not have a mandate that allows for an efficient advocacy effort in order to improve the rights of women who belong to minority groups, come from poor backgrounds or rural communities.

Political Rights and Participation

On the surface Burmese women seem to enjoy the same rights as men and historically Burmese women have enjoyed a high social and economic status. The new constitution which was declared in 2008, states the role and rights of women in the Burma. But a significant event signals that women are still second class citizens of the Burmese society and in the political sector.

During the elections of 2010, none of the women candidates were selected to the Ministers' place where 50 seats were occupied by only men. Even though the state has publicly stated that women should have a role to play and actively participate in politics no women have been appointed or elected to serve as ministers under Burma's new government. Months after the election a handful of female members of Parliament were obtained of their positions and their liberty (only 114 out of 3,000 candidates were women). Most of them were from the USDP (the United Solidarity and Development Party). With a government party dominated by a male majority how will the government be able to represent and protect the rights of women?

To this day, women from Burma continue to belong to the most vulnerable sections of society, they are not represented in the new government and have no influence on the executive, legislative and judicial powers, they lack basic rights and human rights abuse continues to be committed against them with impunity.

Police Complicity and the Lack of Legal Redress

Filing complaints on rape cases and sexual torture committed by a military senior officer or the police is still risky business in Burma. Marital rape is not recognized as a criminal offence in Burma. Some victims and families that file complaints are verbally and physically assaulted and mostly the complaints do not lead to any action being taken. In some cases, the complainant is tortured and sentenced to prison on false charged. In some instances the police, government officials and district law officers refuse to investigate or prosecute rape cases where the military or government officials are complicit. Silencing tactics and the use of forces is used to silence the accusers and block the road to justice.

The military is capable of raping with impunity especially in ethnic zones. A number of documented cases highlight that in the parts of Burma ravaged by civil war there is no rule of law. The Township Peace and Development Chairman and the police do not assist the victims in rape case committed by military.

Reports from international women's organizations such as the 'License to Rape' and 'Shattering Silences' confirm that rape is being condoned by the military as a strategic weapon in the war. Sexual violence by military troops and authorities is also prevalent in ceasefire and "non-conflict" areas throughout the country, including central areas of Burma.
The policing system in Burma is ruled by a military dictatorship, so there is no legal action taken against military perpetrators. There are legal provisions, but they are not being enforced. In Penal code, article 376 it is stated that "Whoever commits rape shall be punished with transportation for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine, unless the woman raped is his own wife and is not under twelve years of age, in which case he shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.". However, article 375 makes an exception in certain types of rape cases. It states that: "Exception -- Sexual intercourse by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under thirteen years of age, is not rape." This article is a direct violation of the rights of women.

We need to listen to alternative voices in order to truly assess the existing conditions for women inside Burma. Only then can we ensure that improvements are made. It is critical that women inside Burma have access to information about their rights under CEDAW and the state's obligations to secure the rights of women.

The AHRC will continuously stand in solidarity for the women from Burma who are deprive of the dignity and rights under 2008 constitution. We demand accountability from the Burmese military government for and  urges the government should be figure out what the remedies and compensation to the women in Burma.

The new government in office has furthered political reforms and changes are taking place inside the country. However, a legal framework that protects the women of Myanmar is still needed. Women from all over the country that live in conflict zones and in areas where there is no conflict are still not guaranteed justice, because there is no rule of law in Myanmar.
Document Type :
Statement
Document ID :
AHRC-STM-052-2012
Countries :